Radu Albot vs Charlie Robertson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Oct at 06:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Albot vs C. Robertson

MDA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Albot 0 - 1 Robertson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Radu Albot winning 1 and Charlie Robertson winning 2. The last match between Charlie Robertson and Radu Albot was at the Hamburg Challenger, 19-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Charlie Robertson getting the victory 0-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Albot | 0 |
| Robertson | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Hamburg Challenger(10-19-25)
R. Albot vs C. Robertson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,958,187 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.90% (640-505) | Career Total W/L | 41.46% (17-24) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 24 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Albot vs C. Robertson Match Preview:
- In the last six months, second serve points show Charlie Robertson winning 40.40%, whereas Radu Albot wins 44.36%. Who seems more dominant with the second serve? Radu Albot holds a slight advantage here.
- Return points on opponents’ second serves reveal Charlie Robertson's 47.39% effectiveness, compared to Radu Albot’s 46.32%. In terms of returning first serves, Charlie records 33.60%, outshining Radu’s 29.31%. Does Charlie have an edge here? Yes, especially on first serve returns.
- Assessing how players handle pressure, Charlie Robertson saves 53.98% of breakpoints; Radu Albot fares better with 55.49%. Could this difference impact their performance? Likely, especially during crucial points.
- In the past year, Charlie Robertson's win rate stands at 30.00% (6/14), while Radu Albot registers a higher percentage at 42.31% (22/30). Does this suggest a trend? Radu seems to have a stronger recent overall performance.
- When evaluating surface performance, both players have their best career winning percentage on indoor hard courts, but Radu Albot is more balanced across surfaces. Does this hint at a consistent performance from Radu across different playing fields? It seems so.
- Comparatively, Charlie plays mostly in lower-tier tournaments (Futures/ITF), winning 35.71%, while Radu competes at higher levels (Challengers), with a 47.50% win rate. Is Radu more experienced against tougher competition? This evidence suggests he is.
- Radu has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average compared to Charlie (330.73 vs. 345.75) over the past year. Does this demonstrate a challenging competition exposure for Radu? Yes, it gives him a competitive edge.
- In deciding sets, Charlie's win rate is a mere 13%, while Radu excels at 60%. Does Radu show stronger stamina in critical matches? Statistics indicate Radu is more likely to clinch tie-break situations.
Editorial Prediction (October 19, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming tennis match, several key performance metrics offer insight into each player's strengths and likely outcomes. Charlie Robertson shows some adeptness in return game statistics, especially against the first serve, which can be crucial in pressuring opponents.
However, when considering both second serve performance and under-pressure stats, Radu Albot displays a slight edge. His higher breakpoint saving rate and superior win rate in deciding sets suggest he thrives in high-pressure situations, which could be a deciding factor in the match.
Radu's recent match wins and exposure to more competitive tournaments add further weight to his case as the likely favorite. Despite Charlie showing promise in certain areas, Radu's consistent performance across surfaces and experience against tougher opponents position him as the likely winner in this upcoming clash.
Radu Albot vs Charlie Robertson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Albot vs C. Robertson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:49:44 | Average Match Time | 1:49:44 |
| 68% (56/82) | 1st Serve % | 51% (40/79) |
| 54% (30/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (24/40) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 48% (38/79) | Return Points Win % | 50% (41/82) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Albot Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
C. Robertson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||

R. Albot vs C. Robertson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.90% (640/505) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.50% (17/23) |
| 53.33% (1489/1303) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.65% (42/50) |
| 51.27% (13678/13000) | Games Win/Loss | 48.00% (431/467) |
| 60.88% (277/178) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 53.29% (235/206) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 51.56% (99/93) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 50.88% (29/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1840 | Aces Total | 68 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2332 | Total Double Faults | 163 |
| 1:20:22 | Average Match Time | 1:27:36 |
| 530.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.7 |
| 65% (42583/65534) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1339/2356) |
| 66% (28079/42583) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (863/1339) |
| 50% (11532/22944) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (470/1017) |
| 41% (2699/6518) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (100/260) |
| 40% (25840/64849) | Return Points Win % | 40% (982/2426) |
| 51.96% (53/49) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.31% (29/35) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.50% (15/9) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.48% (128/136) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.80% (259/197) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 66.52% (155/78) | Futures W/L | 37.50% (9/15) |
| 56% (598/1068) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 49% (33/68) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (200/401) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 58% (233/401) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 84% (596/501) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 58% (19/11) |
| 16% (596/95) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 42% (19/8) |
| 25% (548/137) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (20/5) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
